Steam Catapult » U.S. economy

Tweets of the Week

David Pinsen — Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:43:51 +0000

Micro blogging is quicker than regular blogging, but tweets are also more ephemeral: it’s pretty common for someone to read a blog post you wrote a day or a week ago, but not so common for someone to read something you tweeted an hour ago. With that in mind, I’m going to start picking 10 or so tweets from the past week and highlighting them here. Some of these tweets I’m posting because they are insightful or witty in themselves, others because they include interesting links.

The plan is for this post to be the first in a weekly series. If you’re not familiar with Twitter, click on the clickable stuff in the embedded tweets below, and you’ll get the idea.

I’m humbled by the work of all the charities I have thrown out envelopes from.

— Gary Janetti (@GaryJanetti) February 5, 2012

After 30 years of hustling, this guy turned $700 into billions. How he’d allocate a $1 million portfolio now: stks.co/2Gxf $$

— David Pinsen (@dpinsen) February 7, 2012

Lucy Kellaway rips $UBS on a particularly egregious bit of its corporate b.s.: ft.com/cms/s/0/bae01b…

— David Pinsen (@dpinsen) February 7, 2012

Hyperbole is worse than Hitler.

— Andy Levy (@andylevy) February 7, 2012

Facebook graffiti artist might be richer than @mittromney. Stock v. cash: “Likes to gamble”; had faith in @sparker. finance.yahoo.com/news/facebook-… $FB

— David Pinsen (@dpinsen) February 8, 2012

BREAKING: Ann Romney tells heckler, “My husband can’t f@*king throw the ball and catch it at the same time!”

— Philip Klein (@philipaklein) February 8, 2012

What I am told the female students at Cal Tech say of their situation: “The odds are good, but the goods are odd.” Love it.

— Charles Murray (@charlesmurray) February 10, 2012

.@nytimeskrugman is a uniter! Here, 2 nemeses unite in disagreement w/ him: RT @bill_easterly: I agree with Jeff Sachs bloom.bg/yMvu45

— David Pinsen (@dpinsen) February 10, 2012

@dpinsen I hate that. Manufacturing is key. Gotta fucking make something, not just sell worthless paper for Chinese poisoned toys.

— Charlie Crystle (@Ccrystle) February 10, 2012

Making Sense of Mandates For the most part, I’ve avoided writing about politics on...
Me on Bloomberg TV Well, my tweet, actually. This one got mentioned Margaret Brennan’s...
A record week A record week Last week was the best week...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Me on Bloomberg TV

David Pinsen — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 22:16:50 +0000

Well, my tweet, actually. This one got mentioned Margaret Brennan’s “InBusiness” show yesterday morning:

@margbrennan You nearly died once from riding 90 mph on the NJ Turnpike without a seatbelt. Was that emblematic of your approach to risk? $$

— David Pinsen (@dpinsen) December8, 2011

I was hoping to embed a clip of Ms. Brennan reading that tweet (Bloomberg helpfully added some footage of Corzine’s horrible wreck), but I couldn’t find it on YouTube or Bloomberg TV’s website. So instead, here’s the tweet from her producer letting me know the tweet was going to be aired:

@dpinsen that question was brilliant! you’re in the show at the top of the 10a!

— Sonja Van Sacker (@svansacker) December8, 2011

BTW, the ability to embed tweets like those examples above was just added to Twitter. Fred Wilson blogged about it earlier today.

Making an iPhone App that people will buy More functionality isn’t always better Last week, a developer/entrepreneur...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

What $41 million in venture capital won’t buy you

David Pinsen — Sat, 27 Aug 2011 06:07:19 +0000

Revenues, apparently. Remember Color, the mobile app that received $41 million in venture financing a few months ago?

I have AppShopper’s top-200 grossing finance app rankings bookmarked (and was pleasantly surprised to see Portfolio Armor crack into the top-5 on Thursday), but after being reminded about Color by a chapter about it (“Color and Mania in the Valley”) in Tim Knight’s new book, The Slope of Hope Bathroom Reader, I looked up Color out of curiosity.

Appshopper classifies it as a social networking app, so I looked for it on AppShopper’s top-200 grossing ranking of social networking apps (Color is a free app, but free apps still appear in the top-200 grossing rankings, if they generate enough revenue from in-app sales or other sources). It wasn’t anywhere on the list.

Portfolio Armor cracks the Top-10 After 24 straight days on AppShopper.com’s top-200 list of highest-grossing...
Breaking into the Top-5 A day after cracking the top-10 on AppShopper.com’s top-200 list...
Trying to prove myself wrong In a recent post (“Lessons from Instapaper on app pricing”),...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Living in interesting times

David Pinsen — Sun, 07 Aug 2011 20:25:42 +0000

Last week was an interesting week for stocks, and, if the performance of one foreign stock market that was open today is any guide, tomorrow may be interesting too. Here’s a snapshot of how stocks did on Israel’s Tel Aviv stock exchange this Sunday:

Last week was also the best week yet for subscriptions to Portfolio Armor and downloads of the Portfolio Armor iOS app.

My two latest Seeking Alpha articles:

“After the Downgrade: Hedging US Treasuries”

“Lessons from Thursday’s Market Meltdown“

Today’s market meltdown I just submitted an article to Seeking Alpha about this,...
Trying to prove myself wrong In a recent post (“Lessons from Instapaper on app pricing”),...
Updates for 7.22.2011 – Richard Florida was back this week, with another...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Hedging Update — Post Debt Ceiling Edition

David Pinsen — Thu, 04 Aug 2011 05:50:38 +0000

Hedging costs after the debt deal

Last week, with the debt ceiling negotiations dragging on, we looked at the costs of hedging a handful of equity index, gold-, Treasury bond-, and dollar index-tracking ETFs. Below is a snapshot showing the current hedging costs of the same basket of ETFs.

Hedging against a >30% correction in stocks

The table below shows the costs, as of Wednesday’s close, of hedging the same 5 equity index ETFs against greater-than-30% corrections over the next several months, using optimal puts.

Hedging against a >15% correction in bonds, gold, and the dollar

The table also shows the costs of hedging the same gold-, U.S. dollar-, and Treasury Bond-tracking ETFs against greater-than-15% declines over the next several months using optimal puts. First, a quick reminder about what optimal puts are, and a note about costs, followed by a couple of observations.

Optimal puts

With Portfolio Armor (available on the web, and as an Apple iOS app), you just enter the symbol of the stock or ETF you’re looking to hedge, the number of shares you own, and the maximum decline you’re willing to risk (your threshold – you can enter any percentage you like, but the larger the percentage, the greater the chance there will be optimal puts available for the position). Then the app uses an algorithm developed by a finance Ph.D. to sort through and analyze all of the available puts for your position, scanning for the optimal ones.

A step by step example

There is a step by step example of finding optimal puts for a security, with screen shots, in our previous post, “Hedging against a Dollar Drop“. A note about costs

To be conservative, Portfolio Armor calculates hedging costs using the ask price of the optimal puts. In many cases, you may be able to buy the puts for a lower cost (between the bid and the ask prices).

Hedging Costs as of Wednesday’s Close

Symbol	Name	Cost of Protecting against >30% Decline, as % of position

	Equity Index ETFs
QQQ	PowerShares QQQ Trust	1.23%*
SPY	SPDR S&P 500	0.98%*
DIA	SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Avg	0.87%*
EFA	iShares MSCI EAFE Index	2.62%*
EEM	iShares MSCI Emerging Markets	1.61%*

Symbol	Name	Cost of Protecting against a >15% Decline, as % of position

	U.S Dollar ETF
UUP	PowerShares DB US Dollar Index	0.38%*
	U.S. Treasury Bonds
TLT	iShares Barclays 20+ Yr Treas	1.47%*
	Gold
GLD	SPDR Gold Trust	1.50%*

Observations

Two observations jump out here. The first is that hedging costs of TLT have dropped considerably — 1.47% for about 7.5 months of protection this week versus 1.49% for about 5.5 months of protection last week. That makes sense intuitively, considering that the risk of near term default, however remote it was, is off the table now (though the risk of a downgrade in medium term isn’t).

The second observation is that the costs of hedging GLD relative to TLT have jumped this week: 1.50% for GLD versus 1.47% for TLT this week, compared to 0.64% for GLD versus 1.49% for TLT last week.

*Based on optimal puts expiring in March, 2012.

Hedging Update — Default Watch Edition Credit Suisse on the consequences of a default On...
Hedging Update — ETFs With weak economic data and renewed risks from the...
Hedging against a dollar drop Chafing at the world’s reserve currency After the excitement...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Hedging against a dollar drop

David Pinsen — Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:14:19 +0000

Chafing at the world’s reserve currency

After the excitement of the U.S. debt ceiling negotiations going down to the wire, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin offered these comments about the U.S. and its dollar:

They are living like parasites off the global economy and their monopoly of the dollar.

[...]

If over there (in America) there is a systemic malfunction, this will affect everyone,” Putin told the young Russians. “Countries like Russia and China hold a significant part of their reserves in American securities … There should be other reserve currencies.

With Putin’s sentiments in mind, let’s look at a way to hedge against a further drop in the dollar

Hedging the dollar

The steps below show how to hedge the dollar by buying optimal puts on the PowerShares DB USD Index (UUP) as a proxy for it. First a quick reminder about what optimal puts mean in this context.

About optimal puts

Optimal puts are the ones that will give you the level of protection you want at the lowest possible cost. As University of Maine finance professor Dr. Robert Strong, CFA has noted, picking the most economical puts can be a complicated task. With Portfolio Armor (available on the web and as an Apple iOS app), you just enter the symbol of the stock or ETF you’re looking to hedge, the number of shares you own, and the maximum decline you’re willing to risk (your threshold). Then the app uses an algorithm developed by a finance Ph.D to sort through and analyze all of the available puts for your position, scanning for the optimal ones.

A step by step example

Step 1: Enter a ticker symbol

In this case, we’re using UUP as a proxy for the dollar we’ve entered UUP in the Ticker Symbol field below.

Step 2: Enter a number of shares

For the purposes of this example, let’s assume an investor has a $1 million portfolio, all in dollar-denominated assets. So, since we’re using UUP as a proxy, the number of shares we’ll enter will be $1,000,000 / the most recent share price of UUP ($21.17, as of after hours Monday) = 47,236.7. We’ve rounded that up to 47,237 and entered that number in the “Shares Owned” field in the screen cap below.

Step 3: Enter a decline threshold

You can enter any percentage you like for a threshold when using Portfolio Armor (the higher the percentage though, the greater the chance you will find optimal puts for your position). I’ve entered 15% in the “Threshold” field below.

Step 4: Click the red button

A moment after clicking the red button, you’d see the screen cap below, which shows the optimal put option contracts to buy to hedge against a >15% drop in UUP between now and March 16, 2012. The cost of this protection on a $1 million position would be $6,608, or about 0.66% of the position value.^{1, 2}

¹Note that, in this case, Portfolio Armor rounded down the number of shares of UUP we entered to the nearest hundred (since one put option contract represents the right to sell one hundred shares of the underlying security), and then presented us with 472 of the put option contracts that would slightly over-hedge the 47,200 shares of UUP they cover, so that the total value of our 47,237 shares of UUP would be protected against a greater-than-15% decline.

²To be conservative, Portfolio Armor quoted that cost based on the ask price of the optimal puts. In practice, an investor can often purchase puts for a lower price, i.e., some price between the bid and the ask.

Hedging Update — Default Watch Edition Credit Suisse on the consequences of a default On...
Cost of Hedging Treasury Bond Exposure Still Low, but Rising The chances of a debt ceiling deal The Intrade prediction...
Hedging Update — ETFs With weak economic data and renewed risks from the...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Hedging Update — Default Watch Edition

David Pinsen — Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:08:50 +0000

Credit Suisse on the consequences of a default

On Thursday, Credit Suisse’s global strategy team said that a U.S. default was still unlikely. However, they predicted that if the U.S. did default, stocks would suffer a 30% drop.

Hedging against a >30% correction in stocks

With that in mind, the table below shows the costs, as of Thursday’s close, of hedging 5 equity index ETFs against greater-than-30% corrections over the next six months, using optimal puts.

Hedging against a >15% correction in bonds, gold, and the dollar

The table also shows the costs of hedging gold-, U.S. dollar-, and Treasury Bond-tracking ETFs against greater-than-15% declines over the same time period using optimal puts. First, a quick reminder about what optimal puts are, and a note about costs.

Optimal puts

A note about costs

Hedging Costs as of Thursday’s Close

Symbol	Name	Cost of Protecting against >30% Decline, as % of position

	Equity Index ETFs
QQQ	PowerShares QQQ Trust	1.17%*
SPY	SPDR S&P 500	0.73%*
DIA	SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Avg	0.62%*
EFA	iShares MSCI EAFE Index	1.57%*
EEM	iShares MSCI Emerging Markets	1.17%*

Symbol	Name	Cost of Protecting against a >15% Decline, as % of position

	U.S Dollar ETF
UUP	PowerShares DB US Dollar Index	0.14%*
	U.S. Treasury Bonds
TLT	iShares Barclays 20+ Yr Treas	1.49%*
	Gold
GLD	SPDR Gold Trust	0.64%*

*Based on optimal puts expiring in January, 2012

Hedging Update — ETFs With weak economic data and renewed risks from the...
Cost of Hedging Treasury Bond Exposure Still Low, but Rising The chances of a debt ceiling deal The Intrade prediction...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.